Problem nezavisnosti Kosova odavno je prestao da bude problem samo Srbije i Kosova. U Ujedinjenim nacijama ne može da se postigne nikakav dogovor po tom pitanju, a velike sile su se izgleda nepovratno podelile oko tog da li neka teritorija može jednostrano da proglasni nezavisnost, pa se po istom pitanju postavljaju različito od slučaja do slučaja, prema trenutnim simpatijama i interesima - što nije dobro. Broj zemalja u svetu koje žele po ugledu na kosovski recept da proglasi nezavisnost raste. Tenzije i mogućnost sukoba rastu.
Svi, kao, traže neko rešenje, a rešenje im je tu pod nosom.
Ali krenimo iz početka.
Kao prvo, moramo da razlikujemo nezavisnost od suvereniteta jer to su dve različite stvari. Imamo primer dve velike i značajne zemlje koje imaju punu nezavisnost ali nemaju suverenitet. To su Kanada i Australija koje su pristale da suverinet nad svojim državama priznaju Velikoj Britaniji i stvarno ne vidim zašto se ta formula ne bi mogla primeniti i na mnogo manje i realno nebitnije teritorije.
Šta to konkretno znači?
To znači da bi se Kosovu, kao što je slučaj sa Kanadom, dalo pravo na svoju himnu, zastavu, vladu, vojsku, policiju, samostalnost u vođenju monetrane, unutrašnje i spolje politike kao i stolica u Ujedinjenim nacijama. Dakle sve sem suverenosti na teritoriju koju bi zadržala matična država.
To znači da bi Srbiji bila pošteđena poniženja da joj se oduzme deo teritorije i da joj ostane suverenost nad teritorijom koja je vekovima bila njena, što bi se simbolično demonstriralo jednom kancelarijom u Prištini i zastavom na graničnom prelazu.
Šta bi to značilo za svet?
Kao prvo, to bi mogao da postene recept za miroljubivo rešavanje sličnih problema kojih ima stvarno mnogo širom sveta. Zatim, ovakvo kompromisno i pragmatično rešenje bi moglo da postane sastavni deo međunarodnog prava i spreči njegovo kršenje jedostranim proglašavanjem nezavisnosti i njenog priznavannja ili ne priznavanja od strane drugih zemalja zavisno od trenutnih interesa i simpatija. Na kraju, ali ne najmanje bitno je da bi velike sile ostale bez mogućnosti ozbiljnih međusobnih konfrontacija i primenjivanja 'ad hoc' rešenja.
Svi, kao, traže neko rešenje, a rešenje im je tu pod nosom.
Ali krenimo iz početka.
Kao prvo, moramo da razlikujemo nezavisnost od suvereniteta jer to su dve različite stvari. Imamo primer dve velike i značajne zemlje koje imaju punu nezavisnost ali nemaju suverenitet. To su Kanada i Australija koje su pristale da suverinet nad svojim državama priznaju Velikoj Britaniji i stvarno ne vidim zašto se ta formula ne bi mogla primeniti i na mnogo manje i realno nebitnije teritorije.
Šta to konkretno znači?
To znači da bi se Kosovu, kao što je slučaj sa Kanadom, dalo pravo na svoju himnu, zastavu, vladu, vojsku, policiju, samostalnost u vođenju monetrane, unutrašnje i spolje politike kao i stolica u Ujedinjenim nacijama. Dakle sve sem suverenosti na teritoriju koju bi zadržala matična država.
To znači da bi Srbiji bila pošteđena poniženja da joj se oduzme deo teritorije i da joj ostane suverenost nad teritorijom koja je vekovima bila njena, što bi se simbolično demonstriralo jednom kancelarijom u Prištini i zastavom na graničnom prelazu.
Šta bi to značilo za svet?
Kao prvo, to bi mogao da postene recept za miroljubivo rešavanje sličnih problema kojih ima stvarno mnogo širom sveta. Zatim, ovakvo kompromisno i pragmatično rešenje bi moglo da postane sastavni deo međunarodnog prava i spreči njegovo kršenje jedostranim proglašavanjem nezavisnosti i njenog priznavannja ili ne priznavanja od strane drugih zemalja zavisno od trenutnih interesa i simpatija. Na kraju, ali ne najmanje bitno je da bi velike sile ostale bez mogućnosti ozbiljnih međusobnih konfrontacija i primenjivanja 'ad hoc' rešenja.
Što bi narod rekao: I vuk sit i sve ovce na broju!
INDEPENDENCE AND SOVEREIGNTY
Problem of Kosovo self-proclaimed independence long time ago ceased to be a problem of Serbia and Kosovo alone. In the United Nations a consensus on that matter cannot be reached. The 'super power' countries also have opposite views on self-proclaimed independence in general. Some time they support it and some other time they don't, depending on their own interests.
International Law is disregarded and read on reader's wishes. Number of countries which would like to become independent on 'Kosovo recipe' is growing. The chances for conflicts are growing.
The whole world is looking for the right solution and it cannot be found, but it's here, right under our noses.
Let's start from the beginning. First of all we must understand that independence and sovereignty are two different things. One country can be independent but not sovereign and vice versa.
Canada and Australia are two examples that support this. Both are independent countries but under United Kingdom's sovereignty. And if it is so, ant it is, I see no reason why the same concept cannot be applied to smaller and less important countries? Why this concept cannot be applied to Kosovo?
What would it mean in case of Kosovo?
Kosovo, like Canada, would be able to have its own national anthem, flag, government, army, police, independent monetary, domestic and foreign policy and the chair in the UN. Everything except sovereignty.
At the other hand Serbia would be spared from humiliation of loosing territory which is in its possession for centuries and would be able with an office in Prishtina and its flag at the border crossing to demonstrated sovereignty.
What could it mean for the world?
Firstly, this could be taken as a recipe for peaceful solution of similar problem all around the world. It could become a part of International Law and new pragmatic and compromise way to treat such a problem in the future. Thus, countries would not be in position to break the Law in order to unilaterally recognize self-proclaimed independence and at last, but not least, the super power countries would have one reason less to clash.
And everybody's happy! Or...?
International Law is disregarded and read on reader's wishes. Number of countries which would like to become independent on 'Kosovo recipe' is growing. The chances for conflicts are growing.
The whole world is looking for the right solution and it cannot be found, but it's here, right under our noses.
Let's start from the beginning. First of all we must understand that independence and sovereignty are two different things. One country can be independent but not sovereign and vice versa.
Canada and Australia are two examples that support this. Both are independent countries but under United Kingdom's sovereignty. And if it is so, ant it is, I see no reason why the same concept cannot be applied to smaller and less important countries? Why this concept cannot be applied to Kosovo?
What would it mean in case of Kosovo?
Kosovo, like Canada, would be able to have its own national anthem, flag, government, army, police, independent monetary, domestic and foreign policy and the chair in the UN. Everything except sovereignty.
At the other hand Serbia would be spared from humiliation of loosing territory which is in its possession for centuries and would be able with an office in Prishtina and its flag at the border crossing to demonstrated sovereignty.
What could it mean for the world?
Firstly, this could be taken as a recipe for peaceful solution of similar problem all around the world. It could become a part of International Law and new pragmatic and compromise way to treat such a problem in the future. Thus, countries would not be in position to break the Law in order to unilaterally recognize self-proclaimed independence and at last, but not least, the super power countries would have one reason less to clash.
No comments:
Post a Comment